Colebrook Equation
Reference data and engineering information about colebrook equation for fluid mechanics applications.
Overview
The Colebrook equation (also known as the Colebrook–White equation) is the standard implicit relationship for calculating the Darcy–Weisbach friction factor in turbulent pipe and duct flow. It accounts for both viscous effects (via the Reynolds number) and surface roughness, bridging the smooth-pipe and fully-rough regimes described on the Moody diagram.
Because the friction factor appears on both sides of the equation, it cannot be solved algebraically and requires numerical iteration.
Friction loss coefficients in pipes, tubes and ducts.
Key Formulas
Colebrook Equation (implicit)
Swamee–Jain Explicit Approximation
An explicit approximation valid for and :
This form is useful for spreadsheet calculations and programming when iterative solvers are not available.
Pressure Drop (Darcy–Weisbach)
Once is known, the major head loss is:
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Darcy–Weisbach friction factor | — | |
| Absolute pipe roughness | m | |
| Pipe hydraulic diameter | m | |
| Reynolds number () | — | |
| Mean flow velocity | m/s | |
| Kinematic viscosity | m²/s | |
| Pipe length | m | |
| Gravitational acceleration | m/s² |
Typical Pipe Roughness Values
Material | Roughness ε(mm) |
|---|---|
| Glass, drawn tubing | 0.0015 |
| PVC, HDPE pipe | 0.003 |
| Commercial steel / wrought iron | 0.045 |
| Asphalted cast iron | 0.12 |
| Galvanized iron | 0.15 |
| Cast iron | 0.26 |
| Concrete (new, smooth) | 0.3 |
| Wood stave | 0.5 |
| Riveted steel | 3 |
Source: engineeringtoolbox.com
Friction Factor vs Reynolds Number
The chart below uses the Swamee–Jain approximation to show how the friction factor varies with Reynolds number for three relative roughness levels.
Darcy Friction Factor and Head Loss
Darcy Friction Factor vs Reynolds Number
Unit Converter
Colebrook Flow Unit Converter
Restored Original Source Tables
The following tables are restored from the original source page to preserve the complete reference data.
The cached source page also contains a non-engineering layout/search table. For strict source-table preservation, the detected rows are reproduced below and are not friction-factor data.
Cell 1 | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| × | × | 検索 | ||
| × |
Source: engineeringtoolbox.com
Original Source Images
The following original source images are preserved to avoid losing visual reference material. When an image contains chart or tabular data, its extracted values are represented in the page tables, calculators, or interactive charts; remaining images are retained as visual source references.
The Moody diagram chart images are represented interactively above by the Darcy friction-factor curve chart generated from the Swamee-Jain approximation. The static source images are retained below as visual references.
Moody diagram SI

Engineering Notes
- Turbulent flow only. The Colebrook equation is valid only in the turbulent regime (). For laminar flow (), use .
- Friction coefficient at laminar flow. The original source note is preserved here: for fully laminar pipe flow the friction coefficient is calculated directly as .
- Iteration required. Because appears on both sides, a direct solution is not possible. Common numerical approaches include the Newton–Raphson method, fixed-point iteration, or the Swamee–Jain approximation shown above.
- Transition zone caution. In the transition-roughness region (), flow regime is uncertain and friction-factor predictions carry higher uncertainty.
- Hydraulic diameter for non-circular ducts. When applied to rectangular or non-circular cross-sections, replace with the hydraulic diameter , where is the flow area and is the wetted perimeter.
- Roughness aging. The roughness values in the table above represent new/clean conditions. Over time, corrosion, scaling, and biofouling can significantly increase , raising the friction factor and pressure drop. Design with a roughness value one category higher than the new-pipe condition is common practice.
- Moody diagram alternative. The friction factor can also be read graphically from the Moody diagram, which plots against for lines of constant relative roughness .